Structuralism Theory | Structuralism in Literature

Structuralism Theory

Introduction

Structuralism is a theoretical approach in various fields like linguistics, anthropology, psychology, and sociology, aiming to understand phenomena by analyzing the underlying structures that organize them. Developed primarily by Ferdinand de Saussure in linguistics and later expanded by Claude Lévi-Strauss in anthropology, structuralism emphasizes the importance of underlying structures in shaping human experiences and behaviors.

Origins and Development of Structuralism

Ferdinand de Saussure, a Swiss linguist, is widely regarded as one of the key figures in the development of structuralism, particularly in the field of linguistics. His groundbreaking work, “Course in General Linguistics,” published posthumously in 1916, laid the foundations for structuralist thought. It was published by two of his students, Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. They compiled Saussure’s lecture notes and manuscripts from his courses on linguistics and published them as the book “Cours de linguistique générale” (Course in General Linguistics) after his death.

Contribution Of ‘Ferdinand De Saussure’ in Structuralism

Saussure introduced the distinction between synchronic and diachronic linguistics in his work “Course in General Linguistics”.

Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis

Diachronic Analysis

Diachronic analysis focuses on studying language change over time. It examines the historical development of languages, including changes in vocabulary, grammar, phonology, and syntax. This approach looks at how languages evolve over extended periods, tracing their historical roots, and analyzing the factors that lead to linguistic change.

Example:
Studying the evolution of English from Old English to Middle English and Modern English or tracing the historical development of word meanings and usage patterns.
For instance, the word “gay” originally meant “joyful” or “lively” but has evolved to primarily refer to homosexuality in contemporary usage.

Synchronic Analysis

Synchronic analysis, in contrast, focuses on studying language as it exists at a particular moment in time, without considering its historical development. This approach examines the structure, organization, and patterns of language as they exist in a given moment, without reference to past or future stages of the language.

Example: Studying the grammatical structure of Modern English, analyzing the phonological patterns of a dialect, or examining the semantic relationships between words in a lexical network.

Langue and Parole

Ferdinand de Saussure introduced the concepts of “langue” and “parole” to distinguish between two aspects of language in his structuralist approach to linguistics.

Langue

“Langue” refers to the underlying system or structure of language that exists within a particular linguistic community. It represents the abstract set of rules, conventions, and norms that govern the organization and use of language. It encompasses the grammar, vocabulary, phonology, and semantic rules that allow individuals to produce and understand meaningful utterances.

Example: Grammatical rules

Parole

“Parole” refers to the individual instances of speech or writing produced by speakers or writers within a linguistic community. It represents the concrete, observable manifestations of language use in specific communicative contexts. Parole is the implementation of the underlying linguistic system (langue) through speech acts or written texts.

Example: Spoken conversations, written texts, poetry and storytelling.

Binary Oppositions

Saussure introduced the concept of binary oppositions as a fundamental principle in understanding the structure and organization of meaning in language. Binary oppositions refer to pairs of contrasting terms or concepts that define each other through their opposition or difference.
Examples:
Good vs. Evil
Hot vs. Cold
Male vs. Female
Day vs. Night
Presence vs. Absence
Nature vs. Culture

Signifier and Signified

Ferdinand de Saussure introduced the concepts of “signifier” and “signified” as fundamental components of the linguistic sign in his structuralist approach to semiotics and linguistics. Let’s break down each concept with examples:

Signifier

The signifier is the physical form or the linguistic expression that represents a concept or an idea. It is the perceptible, tangible aspect of the sign that we can hear, see, or otherwise perceive.

Example: In the linguistic sign “cat,” the sound pattern /kæt/ or the written word “cat” serves as the signifier.

Signified

The signified is the mental concept, idea, or meaning associated with the signifier. It is the abstract, conceptual aspect of the sign that the signifier evokes in the mind of the interpreter.

Example: In the linguistic sign “cat,” the signified is the mental image or concept of a small, domesticated, carnivorous mammal with fur, whiskers, and a tail. It represents the mental representation or idea of a cat that is triggered by the signifier “cat.”

Legacy and Influence of Structuralism

Post-Structuralism

The rise of post-structuralism, spearheaded by thinkers like Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida, critiqued and challenged many of structuralism’s assumptions, leading to the development of new theoretical frameworks.

Influence on Other Theoretical Frameworks

Despite its decline in popularity, structuralism continues to influence fields such as semiotics, cultural studies, and literary criticism, shaping our understanding of human culture and cognition.

Conclusion

In conclusion, structuralism has played a significant role in shaping modern theoretical discourse, offering valuable insights into the underlying structures that govern human behavior, language, and culture. While it has faced criticism and undergone transformations, its legacy continues to influence diverse fields of study.

 

Leave a Comment